When I sprained my right ankle last week while training at the Parkour Visions Gym, I was frustrated and a little embarrassed. I am fairly new to the sport of Parkour and often train with much more experienced "traceurs," most of whom are male. So, as I sat curled on the floor of the gym, clutching my lower leg in pain, trying not to cry, I couldn't see anything positive coming from this situation.
Although my ankle improves every day (unless I get too ambitious and go bar hopping, leading to bar hobbling), I'm not at the point where I can comfortably walk and stand for long periods of time. So, when my family came to visit and wanted to spend a few hours traipsing around the zoo, there was only one way I could join in. We rented a wheelchair from the zoo's guest services and an unexpected social adventure on wheels began.
When I first sat down in the wheelchair, I thought, "This is great! I get to be pushed around all day. People will move out of my way because they feel sorry for me. And my ankle will not suffer from my inability to refuse an opportunity to visit the zoo (which I've now been to five times in the last year; maybe it's time to invest in a membership...)."
As we headed toward the giraffes, oryxes, and ostriches, I felt relaxed and cheerful. I was at one of my favorite places (the zoo) with some of my favorite people (family + boyfriend) and, adding icing to the cake, the sun was out in Seattle (if you don't live here, don't even try to understand the monumental nature of the event that is a sunny day in our city)! Naturally, the nice weather meant that EVERYONE was at the zoo.
After leaving the first exhibit and being pushed on toward the hippos, an intense anxiety began to tighten its grip on my wheelchair adventure. I suddenly felt totally out of control. An unseen pair of hands pushed my chair into the crowd and I grew tense every time my suspended feet got too near to someone. My excitement at having never ridden in a wheelchair before quickly turned to dread as I thought about spending the next two or three hours here.
Once I got more accustomed to having minimal control over my physical movement and location, I began noticing the way people were looking, or rather staring, at me. Almost everyone we passed immediately glanced at my legs, as though to attempt to determine why I needed my wheelchair. Some would go out of their way to make eye contact and smile in a sort of, "I'm not judging you," way. One woman, leading her two young kids around, stared and stared at me. Her eyes traveled disbelievingly from face to my legs over and over, like she couldn't connect the image of an otherwise healthy-looking, young woman with the need for a wheelchair. She looked me over so any times that I nearly asked her if she had some sort of problem with me. But I was the one feeling self-conscious and constantly in the way, so I just wheeled myself around in the other direction.
Eventually, I asked my wheelchair assistant (rotating between my relatives and boyfriend) to not push me into any exhibits with large crowds gathered at them. I either got up and walked over or just sat in my wheelchair off to the side, more concerned with being out of the way than seeing the animals.
I don't know if this is a typical experience for people new to wheelchairs. Obviously, I chose to ride around in one and could get up and stretch my legs at any time. I was not fated to live in one for the rest of my life, or even for the rest of the day. But even if it was a totally unique experience, it was an eye-opening one. I think most able-bodied folks take their mobility (and normality) for granted. If you feel like you're in the way, you can move easily and largely without being noticed. If you want to get a little closer to the glass at the orangutan exhibit, you just wriggle your way through the crowd like everyone else. Being able to move freely is a right that everyone should have, but it's also a privilege that I didn't really appreciate until recently.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Until recently, the accusations that politicians are abusing women's health and rights for ideological reasons have been one-sidedly flung at Republic legislators. But with the effort to renew the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) this month, Republicans and their lay supporters are attempting to turn the tables. Conservatives have accused Democratic legislators of manipulating the "GOP war against women" narrative to bully their friends across the aisle into voting in favor of some "controversial" additions to the act:
The Violence Against Women Act empowers law enforcement to crack down on domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking. It was first enacted in 1994 and reauthorized in 2000 and 2005 with little opposition. The current reauthorization includes a new grant program and additional measures to accommodate same-sex couples and unauthorized immigrants, which Republicans on the Judiciary Committee unanimously objected to as it passed the committee last month on a party-line vote (Kapur, 05/16/12).
Republican law-makers assert that their opposition to this year's version of VAWA is not in any way about preventing abused women from getting the aid they need:
|I "resent" being associated with the "war on women"!|
"Nobody opposes the reauthorization of this legislation," Jon Kyl of Arizona, the second-ranking Senate Republican, told CNN. [...] "So what Republicans are focusing on is how to make a bill that should be reauthorized functional in this day and age of significant budget constraints so we can still accomplish the goals of the legislation," Kyl continued. "I really resent the implication by some of my Democratic friends that if you're trying to improve the bill that somehow you are for violence against women. That's reprehensible" (Barrett, 05/15/12).
Indeed, some GOP members are claiming that the additions to the bill are deliberately controversial, implying that Democrats are using the current political climate to pick a fight with Republicans:
Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, put it this way: “I favor the Violence Against Women Act and have supported it at various points over the years, but there are matters put on that bill that almost seem to invite opposition” (Rosenthal, 05/15/12).
Well, I'll give it to Republicans that this is a particularly opportune time for Democrats to introduce some amendments to VAWA that would, at other times, probably be left off the table. It is undoubtable that Democrats --and anyone who is paying even a modicum of attention to the national news lately-- are certainly aware that the "GOP war against women" is currently a popular political narrative. One could even say, without much room for debate, that Democrats are using this narrative not only to pass legislation that would otherwise be too controversial (only because Congress is regrettably full of anti-immigration and/or homophobic folks), but also to increase their favorable standing with women voters and, yes, make Republicans look bad (isn't the thought of political parties trying to undermine each other in an election year absolutely appalling?!).
Here's why no one should be bothered by Republicans' complaints that they are being "unfairly" portrayed as anti-woman by Democrats trying to renew and improve VAWA: they are doing 90% of the work themselves. Even Fox News concedes that Republicans are making a sport out of alienating themselves completely from women voters. The Republican legislative assault on reproductive rights is basically undeniable:
|Read the full report.|
And, as the legislative attacks on women's reproductive rights become increasingly outrageous, women are going to become increasingly outraged and, thereby, more receptive to further confirmation that many Republican legislators simply do not care about them (us). So, pardon me if I see absolutely no point in criticizing Democrats for "fir[ing] the latest political shot in what they are calling the Republican 'war against women' (Associated Press, 03/15/12). They're just calling it like they see it, folks. Democrats have been allowing the GOP to play offense (offensively, I might add) on women's rights for too long. This newly demonstrated initiative is sure to win a few elections!